Ogden was a supreme court case dealing with interstate commerce. The decision confirmed that the commerce clause of the constitution granted congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, including the commercial use of navigable. Livingston and robert fulton the exclusive right of navigating the waters of that state with steamboats are in collision with the acts of congress regulating the coasting trade, which, being made in pursuance of the constitution. Ogden, united states supreme court, 1824 gibbons was granted permission from congress to operate steamboats in new york. Ogden 1824 cornell university law school legal information institute. In 1824, new york created a law that granted aaron ogden a monopoly over steamboat access to the hudson river. Ogden was a united states supreme court case from 1824. Follow report by nick451 10192015 log in to add a comment answer. Ogden, law, and society in the early republic examines a landmark decision in american jurisprudence, the first supreme court case to deal with the thorny legal issue of interstate commerce.
This may have given more power to the national government, but it also prevented any state from receiving special. For more information on the gibbons v ogden case read the fact file below or download our comprehensive worksheet pack to utilise within the classroom or. Commerce clause united states constitution britannica. Read the full opinion or learn more about the marshall court. Featuring 100 milestone documents of american history from the national archives. The appellant contends that this decree is erroneous because the laws which purport to. Ogden, the supreme court once again reinforced the federal power over state power. It gave the congress the power to control interstate commerce. Supreme court in 1824, was a major step in the expansion of the power of the federal government to deal with challenges to u. Robert fulton first used a steam engine to power a boat to steam upriver from new york city to albany, ny in august of 1807. Aaron ogden and other competitors tried to forestall the monopoly, but livingston.
Ogden was granted a license by the state of new york to operate his steamboat in the same manner. After the state of new york denied gibbons access to the hudson bay, he sued ogden. Kennedy filed a concurring opinion, in which oconnor joined. This was a bill filed by the plaintiff below, ogden, against the defendant below, gibbons, in the court of chancery of the state of newyork, for an injunction to restrain the defendant from. Ogden was the first case of its kind to address the commerce clause of the constitution and had no precedents. Livingston, a monopoly on steamboat navigation in state waters if they developed a steamboat. The oyez project at iit chicagokent college of law, gibbons v. The state of new york agreed in 1798 to grant robert fulton and his backer, robert r. William wirt attorney general of the united states, for gibbons. Can you think of any laws that have been put in place related to these inventions. Ogden 1824 please note that these files are quite large 23 megabytes and may take over an hour to download on a 28.
Ogden in 1824 brought into sharp relief the ongoing tugofwar for power between individual states and the federal government. Ogden established the principle that states cannot pass laws that interfere with the power of congress to regulate interstate commerce. For more information on the gibbons v ogden case read the fact file below or download our comprehensive worksheet pack to utilise within the classroom or home environment. When thomas gibbons tried to start a rival service, ogden sued, claiming his rights were being violated. Ogden resources include background summaries, key excerpts of the majority opinion, and a diagram of how this case moved through the court system pbs. Name date class supreme court case studies 1 continued. What does that law have to do with interstate commerce. Ogden resources include background summaries, key excerpts of the majority opinion, and a diagram of how this case moved through the court system. Livingston and robert fulton the exclusive right of navigating the waters of that state with steamboats are in collision with the acts of congress regulating the coasting trade, which, being made in pursuance of the constitution, are supreme. John marshall chief justice ruled for gibbons gibbons won because the federal licensing act of 1793 was violated when ogden was given an exclusive grant from. In this commerce clause case, the supreme court affirmed congresss power to regulate interstate commerce, and held that by virtue of the supremacy clause, state laws must yield to constitutional acts of congress.
The case was argued by some of americas most admired and capable. Mar 14, 2017 following is the case brief for gibbons v. Mostly because of a disagreement between who should be regulating the trading of goods and services between states. For multipage documents such as this one, we offer the first and last pages for download below. Ogden was an important development in the interpretation of the commerce clause of the constitution article i, section 8. Chief justice marshall delivered the opinion of the court, and, after stating the case. Invention impact can you think of any laws that have been put in place related to these inventions. By applying the commerce clause of the constitution, the court set a key precedent for federal authority. Aaron ogden december 3, 1756 april 19, 1839 was an american soldier, lawyer, united states senator and the fifth governor of new jersey. Gibbons appealed the ruling to the united states supreme court.
Supreme court case establishing the principle that states cannot, by legislative enactment, interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce. As a result, ogden sued gibbons claiming he was violating his monopoly rights. Presents a conflict between the states and congress over the authority to regulate commerce. Aaron ogden had a license from the state of new york to navigate between new york city and the new jersey shore. Thomas gibbons the vote of the ruling was unanimous. Ogden 1824 in 1824, the state government of new york state allowed for 2 men robert fulton and robert livingston to maintain the authority to regulate the waterways existing between new york and new jersey. Ogden found himself competing with thomas gibbons, who had been given permission to use the waterways by the federal government. This meant that under new york law, nobody could operate. This is an appeal from an order of the court of chancery, denying a motion for dissolving an injunction, whereby the steamboat of the appellant was restrained from running between elizabethtown point in newjersey and the city of new.
Thomas gibbons a steamboat owner who did business between new york and new jersey under a federal coastal license formed a partnership with ogden, which fell apart after three years when gibbons operated another steamboat on a new york route belonging to ogden. Ogden, the first supreme court decision to discuss the commerce. Gibbons v ogden 1824 in 1807, aaron ogden purchased exclusive rights to operate steamboats between new york city and new jersey from mr fulton and mr livingston. Later, these men transferred their right to a man named ogden. Includes images of original primary source documents, lesson plans, teacher and student competitions, and educational resources. It placed the responsibility of regulating trade and commerce in congresss hands, while it restricted regulations from being confined to one particular state. Ogdenarose out of litigation between owners of rival steamboat lines over passenger and freight routes between the neighboring. Ogden is perhaps best known today as the defendant in gibbons v. Lopez 1995 to accompany modern debate over the commerce clause rehnquist, c.
Article 1, section 8, clause 3 commerce document 14. The court ruled that under that clause congress had powers to regulate any aspect of commerce that crossed state lines, including. Chief justice marshall delivered the opinion of the court, and, after stating the case, proceeded as follows. Ogden the power to regulate commerce is general, and has no limitations other than those prescribed in the constitution itself. Gibbons v ogden was a landmark case of the united states supreme court decided in 1824. In this case, which linked states authority to license steamboats in federal waters with a seemingly unrelated issue, slavery, chief justice marshall interpreted the constitution to give the federal government. Ogden 1824 vastly expanded the powers of congress through a single clause in the constitution. Ogden, law, and society in the early republic on jstor. Gibbons obtained a license, pursuant to federal law, to run a ferry in new york waters, thus, running in interference with ogdens license. Constitution article i, section 8 that authorizes congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with indian tribes. Ogden filed suit for an injunction to prevent gibbons from operating his steamboats. Clause, chief justice john marshall endorsed the notion of a dormant.
These exclusive rights had been granted by the state of new york. Jan 21, 2016 gibbons vs ogden explained in 5 minutes 1824. It is exclusively vested in congress and no part of it can be exercised by a state. Following the 1812 decision of the new york court of errors in livingston v. Ogden filed suit against gibbons in new york state court, and received a. Ogden was given an exclusive license, pursuant to a new york statute, to run a ferry between new york and new jersey. Reading take your boat and go home in 1803, the state of new york passed a law giving two men, livingston and fulton, the right to be the only ones allowed to operate steamboats in new york waters. When thomas gibbons operated steamboats in ogdens route in 1819, ogden sued gibbons. Appeal from the court for the trial of impeachments and the. Ogden supreme court of the united states march 2, 1824, decided no number in original reporter 22 u. In the founders constitution, an anthology of writings letters, records of debates and early cases relating to the federal constitution, justice jonas platts new york court of errors opinion in gibbons v. The commerce clause has traditionally been interpreted both as a.
Gibbons v ogden legal definition of gibbons v ogden. Ogden, law, and society in the early republicexamines a landmark decision in american jurisprudence, the first supreme court case to deal with the thorny legal issue of interstate commerce. This was a bill filed by the plaintiff below, ogden, against the defendant below, gibbons, in the court of chancery of the state of newyork, for an injunction to restrain the defendant from navigating certain steam boats on the waters of the state of newyork, lying between elizabethtown, in the state of newjersey, and the city of new. This month we spotlight one of the earliest cases exploring the division between state and federal power. The case gave more specific meaning to commerce and changed the division of power between the federal and state governments. Ogden, the scotus reestablished congress power over interstate commerce and reinforced the constitution as the supreme law of the land. In 1811 fultons company gave aaron ogden a license to run a ferry service between new york and new jersey. This clause authorizes congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with indian tribes.
950 1339 90 1120 1130 151 982 576 1226 1018 1479 1345 138 1441 1517 461 72 47 143 761 115 224 642 471 116 640 1070 54 199 482 596